Paper Grading Agent with Personalized Feedback
This agent analyzes student papers in depth to produce detailed grading with criteria-based scoring, personalized feedback, and improvement recommendations. It adapts to the academic level, subject, and evaluation criteria defined by the teacher to provide constructive and supportive feedback.
For who
Secondary and higher education teachers looking to save time on grading while offering rich and individualized feedback to each student.
Input
La copie de l'élève (texte complet ou photo transcrite), le sujet ou la consigne, la matière, le niveau scolaire, le barème de notation et les compétences évaluées.
steps (4)
Evaluation Framework Analysis
promptBuilds the evaluation framework adapted to the subject and level before grading.
Detailed Paper Grading
promptGrades the paper criterion by criterion using the evaluation framework.
Personalized Student Feedback
promptWrites constructive, supportive feedback tailored to the student's strengths and weaknesses.
Teacher Summary and Recommendations
promptProduces a summary card for the teacher with skill diagnosis and remediation suggestions.
Output
Une grille d'évaluation critériée, une correction détaillée avec note, un feedback personnalisé pour l'élève avec exercice de remédiation, et une fiche de synthèse enseignant avec profil de compétences et recommandations pédagogiques.
Example
Input
Subject: French — Level: 10th grade — Type: Literary commentary — Topic: Comment on the extract from The Imaginary Invalid by Moliere (Act III, scene 10) — Scale: /20 — Student paper: 'In this scene Moliere criticizes doctors. He uses irony to mock them. Toinette disguises herself as a doctor and says nonsense. Argan believes her which shows he is foolish. Moliere wants to show that doctors of his time are charlatans...' (350-word paper)
Output
Score: 09/20 — Feedback: 'You have correctly identified Moliere's satirical purpose and the role of Toinette's disguise, which is a good starting point. However, your commentary remains descriptive (you retell the scene) instead of analyzing the literary devices. For example, when you write that Argan is foolish, you should show how Moliere constructs this comedy through the dialogue...' — Remediation exercise: rewrite a paragraph following the Device, Quotation, Analysis, Interpretation method.
Customization
| Parameter | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Niveau de détail du feedback | Ajuste la longueur et la profondeur du feedback élève selon le temps disponible | détaillé (feedback complet avec exercice de remédiation) |
| Ton du feedback | Adapte le registre entre encourageant (élèves fragiles), équilibré (standard) ou exigeant (élèves avancés) | équilibré |
| Format de la note | Système de notation : sur 20, sur 10, par compétences (A/B/C/D), ou sans note | /20 |