What are the use cases for this prompt?

This prompt can be used for: Debugging Code.

What is the difficulty level and which AI tool should I use?

This prompt is intermediate level. It works with all AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.).

Are there variants of this prompt?

Yes, 3 variants are available: Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced.

💻DeveloppementIntermediateAll AIs

GitHub Copilot Prompt for Debugging Code

Debugging is one of the most time-consuming tasks in software development. GitHub Copilot, integrated directly into your code editor, can significantly speed up this process by analyzing your code, identifying likely causes of a bug, and suggesting targeted fixes. Unlike manual searches on Stack Overflow or in documentation, Copilot has access to the full context of your file and project, allowing it to provide more relevant diagnostics. Whether you are facing a runtime error, unexpected behavior, or a performance issue, a well-structured prompt enables Copilot to act as an experienced pair programmer reviewing your code with fresh eyes. The goal is not simply to fix a line, but to understand the root cause of the problem to prevent it from recurring. In this guide, you will find optimized prompts to fully leverage GitHub Copilot's debugging capabilities, suited for different expertise levels and common bug types encountered daily.

Paste in your AI

Paste this prompt in ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and customize the variables in brackets.

Analyze the following code and identify all potential bugs. For each bug found:

Precisely describe the problem (affected line, current behavior vs expected behavior)
Explain the technical root cause
Propose a fix with corrected code
Indicate if this bug could cause other cascading issues

Context: [BRIEFLY_DESCRIBE_WHAT_THE_CODE_IS_SUPPOSED_TO_DO]
Observed error: [PASTE_THE_ERROR_MESSAGE_OR_DESCRIBE_THE_UNEXPECTED_BEHAVIOR]
Environment: [LANGUAGE, FRAMEWORK, VERSION]

[PASTE_YOUR_CODE_HERE]

After the analysis, suggest unit tests to verify the fixes work and prevent regressions.

Personalize this prompt with Léa

Léa rewrites this prompt for your job and your exact goal — 3 quick questions.

Why this prompt works

This prompt works because it structures the request by providing Copilot with the necessary context (code intent, observed error, environment) for an accurate diagnosis. Decomposing into numbered steps forces a methodical analysis rather than a superficial fix. The request for tests at the end ensures a comprehensive approach that goes beyond a simple patch.

Use Cases

Debugging Code

Variants

Expected Output

Copilot produces a structured diagnosis identifying each bug with its exact location, a clear explanation of the root cause, and corrected code ready to integrate. You also get targeted unit test suggestions to validate fixes and prevent future regressions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can GitHub Copilot debug code in any programming language?

GitHub Copilot supports most popular languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C#, Go, Rust, PHP, Ruby, etc.) with varying effectiveness. It performs especially well on languages heavily represented in its training data, like Python and JavaScript. For less common languages, always specify the language and its version in your prompt to get more reliable results.

Copilot Chat or inline suggestions: which method is more effective for debugging?

For debugging, Copilot Chat (side panel or inline with Ctrl+I) is significantly more effective than automatic inline suggestions. Chat lets you describe the problem in natural language, provide context, and iterate on the diagnosis. Use the /fix command in chat to directly request a correction, or select the problematic code before asking your question so Copilot focuses on the right section of code.

How can I improve the accuracy of Copilot's diagnoses when the bug is complex?

Three techniques significantly improve accuracy: first, always include the exact error message and the full stack trace. Second, open related files in your editor, as Copilot uses open tabs as additional context. Third, describe the steps to reproduce the bug and what you've already tried. If the initial diagnosis is incorrect, rephrase your question by ruling out false leads rather than repeating the same query.

Improve this prompt

Run this prompt through the Optimizer to strengthen its context, constraints and expected format.

Improve this prompt with the Optimizer

Comments

LéaAI
Pour maximiser l’analyse, fournis toujours le message d’erreur exact et l’environnement technique. Ajoute aussi un exemple minimal reproductible si le code est long — Copilot cible mieux les anomalies avec un contexte resserré.